data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48317/48317a4b427a8770a49b67065589232aa0ec9662" alt="Digg this Digg It!"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cefc6/cefc6417fb910e30d86e4684dc3bfad326680771" alt="Del.icio.us Delicious"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00727/00727748150c70c032513c06fa0c77f68940682d" alt="Stumble upon Stumble"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32f15/32f15e9a8ee109f86cb94ae064d1d0b9312fa257" alt="Fave on Technorati Technorati"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21240/212409ba4f44dda40d305a2fe66e10bffb01eaff" alt="Tweet this Twitter"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c76ba/c76ba6a753fcacbf145866e7354663692e5c2423" alt="Post to Facebook Facebook"
Power from Water™
Hydrovolts' new hydropower technology taps a plentiful but overlooked global source of renewable energy from water currents in canals and channels. Hydrovolts turbines offer an economical and easy way to generate reliable, local clean power in millions of locations around the world. There's nothing else like it.
Hydrovolts' floating Flipwing turbine is simple to deploy and connect. Just drop it in the water and tether or anchor. No dams, weirs or site preparation are needed, reducing costs and minimizing environmental impacts.
Hydrovolts technology offers reliability, predictability, cost-efficiency and control unmatched by other renewable energy sources.
Hydrovolts' potential market is huge: There are tens of thousands of man-made water canals in countries around the globe whose currents are ideal for generating power from the Flipwing turbine.
Hydrovolts capitalizes upon the large global opportunity of untapped energy of controlled flowing water, enabling clean electricity in places never before possible.
2 comments:
It would be interesting to know the breakdown between energy production and transportation emissions. Obviously the PNW does well due to hydropower. It was interesting to see CA in the bottom 10, especially considering the auto emissions and air quality problems they have. WY takes it on the chin due to small population and high coal production.
I agree, the data rather only whets the appetite for more.
It would be interesting to dig deeper into the numbers to see why, for example, WY measures so poorly. Certainly transportation must be a big element as people in WY probably drive more miles per capita than states where shopping and work may be closer to home, or where use of public transit is proportionally higher (like NY.)
Also affecting the rankings would be the ratio of population to industrial activity (in the case of WY that would be mining especially.) This may explain why states like CA fare better. (I think you meant to say that CA was in the top 10 didn't you?)
I was surprised that WA was only number 10--I would have thought it would be higher since 70% of our electrical generation is from hydropower. Being top 10 is great, but with our hydropower advantage it suggests that we're not doing very well on other measures.
As Kermit said, it's not easy being green.
Post a Comment